A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Of Character Law In Trinidad In Fulton
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Fulton
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Libel is an untrue defamatory statement that is made in writing. Slander is an untrue defamatory statement that is spoken orally. The difference between defamation and slander is that a defamatory statement can be made in any medium. It could be in a blog comment or spoken in a speech or said on television.
To call a person a er, a cheat, a child molester, an alcoholic, a liar, a thief, a drug abuser, etc., can be considered grounds for a libel case.
A defamatory statement is one which is untrue and which tends either (a) to lower a person in the estimation of right thinking members of society generally; or (b) to expose a person to hatred ridicule or contempt; or (c) to disparage a person in his or her office, profession, calling, trade or business.
Example of Defamation: “This restaurant uses rotten meat in its dishes.” If this statement is false, it's defamatory because it asserts harmful false statement of fact. Understanding the nature of the statement—opinion versus fact—is critical and typically requires a sophisticated, state specific, legal analysis.
He has launched a defamation suit to refute this. He won a defamation lawsuit over the slur. The legal position on social media defamation is unclear.
If you decide to do it alone, your letter should state the specific defamatory statements made, confirm that they are defamatory, indicate the reputational harm caused, demand an apology and retraction of those statements, and demand that they cease making further statements failing which you will sue them.
Legal Action: If the defamatory statement continues or the harm to your reputation persists, you may consider pursuing legal action. To do so, you can file a defamation lawsuit in the courts of Trinidad and Tobago.
Examples of social media defamation Sharing a video that includes untrue comments about an individual, with the purpose of defaming them and causing harm to their reputation. Leaving a Google review that is false and aimed at tarnishing the reputation of a business.
Importantly, actions for criminal defamation involve prosecution by the state and carry the potential imposition of criminal penalties. Those found guilty could face up to two years in prison. The Act is extremely plaintiff-friendly.
