Suing For Defamation Of Character In South Africa In Franklin
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Abstract. ing to some South African delict scholars, the South African law of defamation makes the wrong fulness of a defamatory statement turn on two conditions: first, that the statement caused reputational damage; and, secondly, that the damage caused was not outweighed by the achievement of some greater good.
To put it simply: yes, if it is defamatory in nature, you could land up in court facing a lawsuit. Defamation can be seen as any wrongful, intentional publication of words or behaviour relating to another person that injures or demeans their status, good name, character or reputation.
What does a defamed person need to prove in court? publication of a statement (verbal and/or written); the defamer must intend to defame a person; there must be harm or injury; and. the publication must violate a person's right to his/her good name, reputation and dignity.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
To establish a defamation case in South Africa, the following elements must be present: Publication: The false statement must be communicated to a third party, which means it has been made known to someone other than the person making the statement and the subject of the statement.
(ii) There is no set maximum amount of damages that a court will order but the general bracket of damages awards in recent years for publications to the public is between ZAR200 000 and ZAR500 000.
The consequences of being charged with criminal defamation, rather than sued in terms of civil law, are significant. First, the accused person has to go through the rigors of a criminal prosecution, which may include arrest and detention and a harrowing criminal trial.
Truth is an absolute defence to defamation. The defendant must prove that the defamatory statements were, in fact, true. For instance, if the statements concern the quality of goods or services, the defendant could provide independent testing or other evidence supporting the truth of the claims.
Truth is the first, and easiest, defense to a defamation claim. As discussed in the elements of defamation, the statement about you must have been false. If a Defendant can show that the statements were true, or even substantially true, then they could defeat a claim for defamation.
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required.
