A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Suing For Defamation Of Character In South Africa In Franklin
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Franklin
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Abstract. ing to some South African delict scholars, the South African law of defamation makes the wrong fulness of a defamatory statement turn on two conditions: first, that the statement caused reputational damage; and, secondly, that the damage caused was not outweighed by the achievement of some greater good.
To put it simply: yes, if it is defamatory in nature, you could land up in court facing a lawsuit. Defamation can be seen as any wrongful, intentional publication of words or behaviour relating to another person that injures or demeans their status, good name, character or reputation.
What does a defamed person need to prove in court? publication of a statement (verbal and/or written); the defamer must intend to defame a person; there must be harm or injury; and. the publication must violate a person's right to his/her good name, reputation and dignity.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
To establish a defamation case in South Africa, the following elements must be present: Publication: The false statement must be communicated to a third party, which means it has been made known to someone other than the person making the statement and the subject of the statement.
(ii) There is no set maximum amount of damages that a court will order but the general bracket of damages awards in recent years for publications to the public is between ZAR200 000 and ZAR500 000.
The consequences of being charged with criminal defamation, rather than sued in terms of civil law, are significant. First, the accused person has to go through the rigors of a criminal prosecution, which may include arrest and detention and a harrowing criminal trial.
Truth is an absolute defence to defamation. The defendant must prove that the defamatory statements were, in fact, true. For instance, if the statements concern the quality of goods or services, the defendant could provide independent testing or other evidence supporting the truth of the claims.
Truth is the first, and easiest, defense to a defamation claim. As discussed in the elements of defamation, the statement about you must have been false. If a Defendant can show that the statements were true, or even substantially true, then they could defeat a claim for defamation.
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required.
More info
It is one of the most misunderstood legal rulings. Individuals and corporations may sue for defamation, but government bodies are precluded from suing.Libel is the written or printed form of defamation. Customer: HI,I am writing to you today to request your assistance in a matter of defamation of character. But some rules around slander and libel are generally accepted. Defamation is a complex legal issue in South Africa that revolves around protecting one's reputation and the responsible exercise of free speech. Many South Africas have landed in legal trouble for their social media posts. Here's what you should know to avoid defamation lawsuits and criminal charges. Learn about defamation of character in South Africa's workplace, including libel, slander, and how to protect your reputation.
