In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Restrictive Covenants In Shareholders Agreements In Palm Beach
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Palm Beach
Control #:
US-00404BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
However, restrictive covenants came under attack when Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its rule banning all non-competes nationally. However, despite the FTC's attempts to ban non-competes, they remain enforceable in Florida.
In the United States, employers generally use four types of restrictive covenants: (1) covenants not to compete for a certain period of time following the employee's termination from employment (or following a business transaction such as a sale, merger, etc.); (2) covenants not to solicit customers or clients for a ...
Florida Statute § 542.335(1)(g)(2) provides that a court:may consider as a defense the fact that the person seeking enforcement no longer continues in business in the area or line of business that is the subject of the action to enforce the restrictive covenant only if such discontinuance of business is not the result ...
In the minority of jurisdictions, like California, courts will likewise disregard the fact that something is labelled as a covenant not to solicit customers and/or clients, and may instead deem it akin to a covenant not to compete and treat it as such.
Yes, non-competes generally hold up in court in Florida. They must be legally valid and also be reasonable.
What is the purpose of a restrictive covenant in company law? Their overall purpose is to prevent any current (and/or departing) shareholders of a company from: carrying on any other business in competition with that company; and. poaching current customers, key suppliers and/or employees from that company.
Are restrictive covenants on property enforceable? Covenants can be unenforceable if they expire, if there is a history of the covenant being violated, or if there is no individual or group benefiting from them. Otherwise, they are generally enforceable and you could face legal action if you ignore them.
Take legal advice before making such a decision. Go to court. If all else fails and a breakthrough cannot be achieved in any other way, the shareholders could refer the matter to the court to resolve the dispute or potentially order a winding up of the company.
In a nutshell, share class restrictions are the limitations, restrictions and conditions placed on the shares in that share class. These restrictions can define how shares could be transferred, and often carry specific limits or restrictions.
Regulating shareholder/directors A shareholders' agreement will often impose restrictions on an exiting shareholder – for example, preventing them from setting up a competing business within a certain area of operations for a particular time.