In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Restrictive Covenants In Commercial Contracts In Mecklenburg
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Mecklenburg
Control #:
US-00404BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The following are common types of restrictive covenants between companies and their employees: Non-compete agreement. Non-solicitation agreement. Non-disclosure agreement.
In North Carolina, there's a noteworthy aspect of restrictive covenants to consider; most covenants automatically expire after 30 years unless they are specifically for residential purposes only. This statutory limitation is a safeguard against outdated or unreasonable restrictions binding properties in perpetuity.
Broadly speaking, 'covenants' are the contractual devices ensuring that a party receives the benefits that it negotiated for in the business deal. In other words, covenants support the achievement of the purpose implied by the key provisions characterising the transaction.
Restrictive covenants are clauses in commercial contracts that limit what a party can do, to protect your business interests. The primary purpose of a restrictive covenant in a commercial contract is to restrict the other party from engaging in certain commercial activities.
"Blue penciling" means striking out an unenforceable or illegal provision, but does not include modification of the provision (such as in Canada, Hong Kong, India, and the UK).
Is garden leave illegal in Canada? The short answer is no. Garden leave hasn't been declared illegal in Canada. If an employment contract contains a properly drafted garden leave clause, the agreement might be legally enforceable.
Restrictive covenants are binding, legal agreements that are attached to property titles. They restrict what the owner of a property can do with the land and, in some cases, also put obligations on the property owner. When you buy a property with a covenant attached, you take on all those restrictions and obligations.
The primary remedy for breach of a Restrictive Covenant is a permanent injunction to restrain the breach. However, the courts have jurisdiction to award damages instead of an injunction.
In Canada, the enforceability of non-compete agreements is quite strict. Courts are cautious and will only enforce such agreements if they protect a legitimate business interest.