In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Contract With Restrictive Covenants In Massachusetts
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Under the new law, the geographic restrictions regarding where a former employee may not compete are limited to the area where, during the past two years of the employee's employment, he or she provided services or had a “material presence or influence.” The statute does not define the phrase “material presence or ...
An "anti-raiding" restrictive covenant is “only reasonable, and thus enforceable, if it is (1) necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, (2) reasonably limited in time and space, and (3) consonant with the public interest.”
level for sure, but plenty of noncompetes are enforced at lower levels. It depends on the state, the job, the actual business risk etc. They would send the employee and new employer a cease and desist. If they don't cease and desist, and can't come to an agreement, former company can eventually sue.
Unfair Competition: The Legal Standard Chapter 93A outlines the regulations for unfair business practices. It states: "Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are hereby declared unlawful."
When it comes to the duration of the non-compete, the courts generally focus on what amount of time it will take the employer to hire and train a like employee. Rarely do you find enforceable employee based non-competes which exceed one (1) year in duration.
An NDA constitutes a legally binding agreement, albeit without the same level of scrutiny as a non-compete clause. It solely restricts the use of information rather than overall competition. Typically, the agreement will specify that the employer is entitled to injunctive relief in the event of a breach.
Massachusetts Law on Non-Disclosure Agreements: In the Massachusetts statute on taking trade secrets, there is a prohibition on taking qualifying information through such acts as embezzlement, stealing, fraud, copying, and other misconduct.
There may be terms in your contract that says you can't work for a competitor or have contact with customers for a period of time after you leave the company. These are called 'restrictive covenants'. Your company could take you to court if you breach the restrictive covenants in your contract.
Time Limitations: §23 & §27 Deed restrictions cannot be enforced for more than thirty years unless a longer period is specifically stated. M.G.L.
If a deed restriction is not enforceable, you can choose to ignore it and take on the risk of a neighbor filing suit, or you can seek out a judge's ruling to have the covenant removed from the deed. Obtaining that ruling is easier when no one is actively enforcing the covenant.
More info
In Massachusetts, noncompete agreements are subject to strict legal requirements and limitations to prevent unfair restraints on employees. An agreement that imposes adverse financial consequences on a former employee as a result of the termination of an employment relationship.The enactment of the MNCA does not bar out of state employers from enforcing reasonable restrictive covenants against Massachusetts employees. Nonsolicitation clauses restrict who an employee can contact after they leave a job. Under most circumstances, restrictive covenants executed after December 31, 1961 are no longer enforceable after 30 years, according to Massachusetts law. The new law significantly restricts an employer's ability to enforce a noncompetition agreement against a former employee or independent contractor. The Oxford decision has two key takeaways for Massachusetts employers that require their employees to sign restrictive covenants. In most states, restrictive covenants are enforceable only if they serve a legitimate business purpose and are reasonable in duration, geographic scope. The New Law Applies to NonCompete Agreements, But Carves Out Many Other Types of Restrictive Covenants. Non-compete agreements are subject to very strict guidelines to be enforceable.