This is a multi-state form covering the subject matter of the title.
Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus Example In Fulton
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Fulton
Control #:
US-00277
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Generally, a habeas petition must allege: (1) the identity of the petitioner and the location of his custody; (2) the court order which led to the petitioner's restraint; (3) an illegal restraint on the petitioner's liberty; (4) why the petition is being filed in the appellate court; (5) there is no plain, speedy, and ...
A writ of habeas corpus orders the custodian of an individual in custody to produce the individual before the court to make an inquiry concerning his or her detention, to appear for prosecution (ad prosequendum) or to appear to testify (ad testificandum).
In Georgia, a habeas petition challenges the legality of an inmate's confinement after a direct appeal has failed. A petition may also be used to overturn an invalid sentence, or address a denial of bond. Only people who have been restrained in their liberty may file a habeas petition.
During their presidencies, Abraham Lincoln and George W. Bush both suspended the writ of habeas corpus; while these two situations appear to be similar, the facts surrounding each president's suspension are vastly different.
Today, habeas corpus is mainly used as a post-conviction remedy for state or federal prisoners who challenge the legality of the application of federal laws that were used in the judicial proceedings that resulted in their detention.
For example, if an individual was convicted on the basis that their skin color matched that of the perpetrator ing to eyewitnesses, but there is no other evidence against them, then the individual can appeal for habeas corpus in order to be freed from imprisonment.
Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1976 SC 1207 (popularly known as Habeas Corpus Case) and its culmination in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.)
Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge's refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon's constitutional rights.
Habeas Corpus/Prisoner TitleName Rosario v. Roden, et al District of Massachusetts Gary Bradford Cone v. Wayne Carpenter Western District of Tennessee Arnold v. United States of America Western District of Tennessee United States of America, et al v. Thomas Western District of Tennessee3 more rows
Decision: In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.