This is a class action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983 challenging the manner in which the County of Riverside, California (County), provides probable cause determinations to persons arrested without a warrant. At issue is the County's policy of combining probable cause determinations with its arraignment procedures.
Geography. ing to the U.S. Census Bureau, the county has a total area of 7,303 square miles (18,910 km2), of which 7,206 square miles (18,660 km2) is land and 97 square miles (250 km2) (1.3%) is water. It is the fourth-largest county in California by area.
You can contact the Riverside Superior Court at 951-777-3147 (phone) to speak to a clerk. Please anticipate lengthy wait times for telephone service, and please understand that email responses will be delayed. Phone hours are Monday through Friday, a.m. to p.m., except court holidays.
County of Riverside is a class action lawsuit that challenges Riverside County's policies and practices of charging and collecting detention fees from parents and guardians with a child in the juvenile justice system.
Due to the dignity of Court proceedings, it is requested you wear business casual attire. The following are NOT permitted in the courtrooms: Hats, shorts, tank top, flip flops or beach attire.
McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which involved the question of within what period of time must a suspect arrested without a warrant (warrantless arrests) be brought into court to determine if there is probable cause for holding the suspect in custody.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 152 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013, every Director shall be appointed in a General Meeting by way of Ordinary Resolution. Hence, the proposed resolution is recommended for the consideration and approval of the Members of the Company.
Board of directors In the case of companies that have adopted Model articles, the appointment of a new director can be approved by way of a simple majority of votes at a board meeting. Alternatively, a written resolution can achieve the same result, but it must be unanimous.
(1) The articles of a company may confer on its Board of Directors the power to appoint any person, other than a person who fails to get appointed as a director in a general meeting, as an additional director at any time who shall hold office up to the date of the next annual general meeting or the last date on which ...
Conduct general meeting If the company decides to appoint a director in the middle of the year, it may appoint a director by passing a resolution in an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM). In such a case, a company must conduct a board meeting to pass a resolution for conducting an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM).