Opposing Counsel And In Travis
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Generally speaking, in the US, an opposing attorney does not owe you a duty that would give rise to a claim for legal malpractice. You might have some other claim against them, but not malpractice.
Generally speaking, in the US, an opposing attorney does not owe you a duty that would give rise to a claim for legal malpractice. You might have some other claim against them, but not malpractice.
Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty.
Do not engage. Think of her as a course hazard more than an opponent. Aim your words, always, at the judge. Be on time, be reasonable, be flexible to the extent it will not prejudice or harm your client, and do your best to keep all interactions in writing and on the record.
Do not engage. Think of her as a course hazard more than an opponent. Aim your words, always, at the judge. Be on time, be reasonable, be flexible to the extent it will not prejudice or harm your client, and do your best to keep all interactions in writing and on the record.
In California, a defendant brings a Marsden motion when they want to fire their court-appointed attorney on the grounds of ineffectiveness. The court considers and rules on the motion at a Marsden Hearing. The motion can be filed in either misdemeanor or felony cases, before or during trial.
Send a final meet and confer letter. If you've requested dates multiple times (hopefully in writing) and still no response, unilaterally set a date. If opposing counsel then objects that he/she/the client is not available, tell them that's too bad and that they've been given multiple opportunities to set a date.
In California, a defendant must prove the following to establish that their attorney was ineffective: the lawyer's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and. the attorney's failure to act competently prejudiced the defendant.
The "Gideon" reference is linked to the famous Supreme Court ruling that individuals charged with serious crimes have a right to counsel. While this right exists in criminal matters, it exists at present only in very limited circumstances in civil matters.
