Suing Opposing Counsel For Malpractice In Tarrant
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Do not engage. Think of her as a course hazard more than an opponent. Aim your words, always, at the judge. Be on time, be reasonable, be flexible to the extent it will not prejudice or harm your client, and do your best to keep all interactions in writing and on the record.
To do so, four legal elements must be proven: (1) a professional duty owed to the patient; (2) breach of such duty; (3) injury caused by the breach; and (4) resulting damages.
If the problem persists, take action before the situation gets worse. Do not pass the issue to someone else in your office. Instead, a frank exchange between you and the opposing counsel may be needed. Perhaps a colleague can serve as an intermediary to smooth the way to a better relationship.
malpractice claim in Texas requires four elements: (1) a duty by the attorney to the plaintiff, (2) the attorney's breach of that duty, (3) proximate cause, and (4) damages. The first element, duty, usually exists because of a formal attorneyclient relationship.
If you find yourself in a situation where you believe the opposing counsel is not being truthful, the key is to rely on evidence and legal procedures to address the issue. You can also consult with a local lawyer in the area of law your case involves to get additional advice on your specific case and this magistrate.
Send a final meet and confer letter. If you've requested dates multiple times (hopefully in writing) and still no response, unilaterally set a date. If opposing counsel then objects that he/she/the client is not available, tell them that's too bad and that they've been given multiple opportunities to set a date.
The general rule is simple: Non-clients generally cannot sue lawyers who did not represent them. This standard, called the privity rule, finds its footing in the definition of legal malpractice.
A plaintiff in a legal malpractice claim must prove the following elements: (1) that there is duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant; (2) that the duty was breached; (3) that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff injury; and (4) that damages occurred.
Texas law imposes caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. ing to the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 74.301, non-economic damages are capped at $250,000 per defendant, with an overall cap of $500,000 if there are multiple defendants.
