Wrongful Interference In A Contractual Relationship In Palm Beach
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Legal Definition of Tortious Interference in Florida: Intentional interference: The interfering party must have acted with the intention of causing harm or disrupting the contractual relationship. Unjustifiable interference: The interference must not be legally justified or protected by law.
As an example, someone could use blackmail to induce a contractor into breaking a contract; they could threaten a supplier to prevent them from supplying goods or services to another party; or they could obstruct someone's ability to honor a contract with a client by deliberately refusing to deliver necessary goods.
Interference With Existing Contractual Relationships A contract exists between the business and another individual or business. The contract was valid. An outside (third) party had knowledge of this contract. The outside party purposefully and wrongfully disrupted the contractual relationship.
If you want to succeed on a cause of action for tortious interference with a contractual relationship, you have to plead and prove: The existence of a contract. The defendant's knowledge of the contract. The defendant's intentional procurement of the contract's breach. Damages to the plaintiff as a result of the breach.
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm.
Florida Laws On Custodial Interference Florida Statute §787.03 describes the offense of custodial interference as occurring when any parent or guardian intentionally takes, entices, aids, abets, or otherwise hires another person to take a minor away from their lawful custodian.
To recover damages for inducing breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove that: The plaintiff was in a valid contractual relationship with a third party; The defendant knew of the existing contract; The defendant intended to induce the third party to breach the contract with the plaintiff;
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
