Tortious Interference For In Fairfax
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Proving tortious interference in court is complicated. It is a complex legal issue that requires a great deal of evidence. Your best recourse is to have a business attorney who specializes in tort and contract law.
As an example, someone could use blackmail to induce a contractor into breaking a contract; they could threaten a supplier to prevent them from supplying goods or services to another party; or they could obstruct someone's ability to honor a contract with a client by deliberately refusing to deliver necessary goods.
Interference With Existing Contractual Relationships A contract exists between the business and another individual or business. The contract was valid. An outside (third) party had knowledge of this contract. The outside party purposefully and wrongfully disrupted the contractual relationship.
In Dunlap v. Cottman Transmission Sys., LLC, the court outlined the four elements of tortious interference with contract rights (existence of the contract, defendant's knowledge of the existence of the contract, intentional interference causing a breach of the contract, and resultant damages from the breach).
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Proving tortious interference in court is complicated. It is a complex legal issue that requires a great deal of evidence. Your best recourse is to have a business attorney who specializes in tort and contract law. Proving the legal elements of tortious interference takes experience in commercial litigation.
Courts commonly find that a defendant may not be liable for tortious interference if it proves a defense of one of the following: 1) the protection or exercise of a legal right or interest; 2) the protection of the interests of a third person, including agents acting for the protection of their principals, trustees for ...
The existence of a contract or business expectancy; knowledge of that contract or expectancy by a third party; intentional interference by the third party inducing or causing a breach or termination of the relationship or expectancy; and. resulting damages.
A viable claim for tortious interference with contract or prospective economic advantage generally requires a showing of (1) the existence of a valid contractual relationship or business expectancy with a probability of future economic benefit to the plaintiff; (2) knowledge of the relationship or expectancy on the ...
