This form is a Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages. Plaintiff filed this action against defendant for breaching a non-competition agreement. Plaintiff also contends that the harm suffered as a result of defendant's conduct is irreparable in nature and cannot be measured solely in terms of monetary damages.
Injunctive Relief Agreement Without Court In Suffolk
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Suffolk
Control #:
US-000302
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Any complaint about the conduct of a federally appointed judge (e.g. Superior Court of Justice or Court of Appeal for Ontario) should be directed to the Canadian Judicial Council in Ottawa.
Within 20 days after service of a note of issue and certificate of readiness, any party to the action or special proceeding may move to vacate the note of issue, upon affidavit showing in what respects the case is not ready for trial, and the court may vacate the note of issue if it appears that a material fact in the ...
Removal from Office (a) infirmity; (b) misconduct; (c) failure in the due execution of judicial office; (d) the judge is in a position that a reasonable, fair-minded and informed observer would consider to be incompatible with the due execution of judicial office.
Applicants for a quia timet injunction must prove three elements: 1) there is a serious issue to be tried, 2) there is a high degree of probability that they will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, and 3) the plaintiff will suffer greater harm from refusing the remedy than the defendant will ...
The Canadian Judicial Council, a body of chief justices and associate chief justices from across the country, investigates complaints about the conduct of superior court judges. The Council examines the complaints and their handling, prepares a report and any recommendations, and implements the ensuing actions.
State judges can apparently be sued for injunctive relief, albeit in limited circumstances. Plaintiffs should apparently first seek, and federal courts should first award, declaratory relief before reaching for the more drastic remedy of an injunctive decree.
Except as provided in subdivisions (2), (3) and (4), punishment for a contempt, specified in section seven hundred fifty, may be by fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, not exceeding thirty days, in the jail of the county where the court is sitting, or both, in the discretion of the court.
Rule 202.70. 11-d - Limitations on Depositions (a) Unless otherwise stipulated to by the parties or ordered by the court: (1) the number of depositions taken by plaintiffs, or by defendants, or by third-party defendants, shall be limited to 10; and (2) depositions shall be limited to 7 hours per deponent.