This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Preliminary Injunction Form For Trademark Infringement In Oakland
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Oakland
Control #:
US-000299
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
State as briefly as possible the facts showing that each plaintiff is entitled to the injunction or other relief sought. State how each defendant was involved and what each defendant did that caused the plaintiff harm or violated the plaintiff's rights, including the dates and places of that involvement or conduct.
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008), is applicable to all other litigants seeking preliminary injunctions, and requires that a party seeking a preliminary injunction must establish: (1) it is likely to succeed on the merits, (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of ...
Taking a medical malpractice lawsuit as an example, if a patient believes that their doctor has provided negligent medical care that has caused them harm, the patient may seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the doctor from continuing to provide care.
Mandatory Injunction: Considered as the most rigorous of all injunctions, a mandatory injunction directs the defendant to perform an act. For example, if a court orders the removal of a building or structure due to misplaced construction, then it fits the description of a mandatory injunction.
Winning the Case: To secure a preliminary injunction, the plaintiff must demonstrate a strong chance of winning the case, significant harm without the injunction, greater fairness compared to the other party, and public benefit.
To seek a permanent injunction, the plaintiff must pass the four-step test: (1) that the plaintiff has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for the injury; (3) that the remedy in equity is warranted upon consideration of the balance ...
Preliminary Injunction Standard. A preliminary injunction is proper where the moving party proves: Likelihood that it will ultimately prevail on the merits; and. That relative interim harm to the parties from issuance of the injunction weights in its favor.
This year, the Port of Oakland, which owns the Oakland airport, told the city of San Francisco of its plans to rename the airport as the San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport to make travelers aware of its location in the Bay Area.
Judge orders Oakland airport to halt use of "San Francisco Bay" name in trademark dispute. A federal judge has ordered Oakland airport officials to stop using "San Francisco Bay" in its name, amid a trademark dispute with San Francisco officials.
An injunction is a court order that prohibits a party from taking certain actions such as continuing sales of an infringing product. Injunctions can completely bar the use of the trademark by a party or they can have more specific terms.
More info
Cooley successfully secured a preliminary injunction on behalf of its client, the City and County of San Francisco, in a trademark infringement lawsuit. San Francisco also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (PI) to prevent the Port of Oakland from using the name.San Francisco has already sued in a federal lawsuit to stop the name change, but the preliminary injunction would have an immediate effect. The motion for a preliminary injunction is asking a judge to order the city of Oakland and Port of Oakland to immediately stop using the new airport name. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction asks the Court to order Oakland to immediately stop usage of the infringing new name. A federal judge granted San Francisco's motion for a preliminary injunction against Oakland. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. The court is scheduled to consider OAK's and SFO's arguments on the preliminary injunction motion on November 7, 2024. On April 14, 1992, Accolade filed a motion in the district court for a stay of the preliminary injunction pending appeal.