After a judgment of possession is rendered by the court, the judge may then issue a writ of execution to begin the transfer of property. The judgment for possession states the plaintiff has a right to the property; the writ of execution actually begins the transfer process from a judgment debtor to a plaintiff.
1. A showing that the defendant gained possession of the property described in the application, which was not entrusted to the defendant, by feloniously taking such property from the plaintiff by means other than by false or fraudulent representation, attached declaration.
A party in whose favor a judgment of possession has been rendered may obtain from the clerk a writ of possession directing the sheriff to seize and deliver the property to him if it is movable property, or to compel the party in possession to vacate the property by use of force, if necessary, if it is immovable.
In California, for a person to claim adverse possession, they must demonstrate that they have been in continuous and exclusive possession of the property for at least five years, openly and notoriously, and under a claim of right or with the belief that they have the legal right to possess the property.
The only thing you can do at this point is file a Motion to Stay Execution of Writ of Possession. This motion will put the execution of the eviction order on hold for up to 10 days.
States the court's order to the sheriff to take and hold property that the plaintiff claims is theirs but that the defendant is wrongly keeping. Also gives defendants information about their rights.
The writ is issued by the Clerk of the U.S. District or Bankruptcy Court under seal of the court.
There must be a judgment for possession in place first. Once that judgment is secured, however, the victorious party may apply for a writ with the clerk of the court. The application must be accompanied by a declaration in order for the clerk to accept it.
Examples: Permanent injunctions are often issued in cases involving ongoing nuisances, such as a factory emitting harmful pollutants, or in cases of trademark infringement, where a company is permanently prohibited from using a trademark that belongs to another business.
Injunctions in California An inadequate remedy at law; A serious risk of irreparable harm absent injunctive relief; A likelihood that plaintiff will prevail on the merits of the controversy; and, A balancing test of the harm to the defendant in granting the injunction versus the harm to the plaintiff in withholding it.