Difference Between Temporary Injunction And Stay Order In Fulton
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Insofar as there is a difference between the two concepts, I agree with the Court that it boils down to this: “A stay 'simply suspends judicial alteration of the status quo,' ” whereas an injunction “ 'grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.
The injunction is something ordered by the judge that can either be permanent or for a specific period of time. The restraining order usually only happens at the beginning of the case, once the person is served with a temporary restraining order and that will only last until the injunction hearing.
Insofar as there is a difference between the two concepts, I agree with the Court that it boils down to this: “A stay 'simply suspends judicial alteration of the status quo,' ” whereas an injunction “ 'grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.
The injunction is something ordered by the judge that can either be permanent or for a specific period of time. The restraining order usually only happens at the beginning of the case, once the person is served with a temporary restraining order and that will only last until the injunction hearing.
Injunctions may preserve and safeguard assets or evidence, or may restrain people from committing certain acts. Mandatory orders require the other party to perform certain acts such as returning property.
A preliminary injunction is temporary relief that preserves the status quo until the courts decide on the merits of the case. The relief sought often involves asking a court to prevent an opposing party from taking specific action or continuing a current course of action.
The Apex Court discussed law on interim relief (Temporary injunction): The primary object of filing suit challenging validity of the order of demolition is to restrain such demolition with the intervention of the court. In such a suit the plaintiff is more interested in getting an order of interim injunction.
