This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
For instance, if a new company wants to build overtop an old gravesite, the owner of the land could file an injunction against the company. The landowner would be the plaintiff and the company trying to build would be the defendant. An injunction would be appropriate in this case because it prevents irreparable harm.
A permanent injunction is allowed by the decree of the Court. It is allowed on the evaluation of the facts and circumstances of the case. Order 39 (Rules 1 to 5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 regulates temporary injunction. Permanent injunction is regulated by Sections 38 to 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
For example, in addition to making a financial judgment against a defendant, a court might issue a permanent injunction ordering that the defendant does not participate in a certain activity or business.
In simple terms, an injunction means that one of the parties to a certain action must either do something or refrain from doing something. Once the court makes its decision, the parties must abide by the ruling.
Example: Cease and Desist A cease and desist order places an injunction on a company or person prohibiting the activities that are deemed suspect. A cease-and-desist order may take the form of a temporary injunction until a trial can be held to determine the outcome or a permanent injunction after the trial concludes.
Prohibitory Injunctions: These are the most common type and essentially tell the respondent what they cannot do. This could include anything from contacting a specific person (the petitioner) to coming near their home, workplace, or even a certain distance from their children's school.
The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant has breached the contract and that injunctive relief is necessary to prevent further harm. The plaintiff must also prove that the harm caused by the breach cannot be adequately compensated through monetary damages alone.
Order 39 Rule 1 CPC Property in Dispute: Where any property in dispute in a suit is in danger of being wasted, damaged, or alienated by any party to the suit, or wrongfully sold in execution of a decree.
To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must show (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, (2) that it would suffer irrepa- rable injury if the injunction were not granted, (3) that an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties, and (4) that the public interest ...
The party asking for an injunctive relief must prove three things: 1) that there is a cause of action against the defendant; 2) that the party seeking the injunction has a right to the property in question; and 3) that the objects in question are in danger of “probable, imminent, and irreparable injury.” In the Strube ...