In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Maricopa
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Maricopa
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Tortious Interference with Contract. Generally, liability for interference with a contract arises when the interferer induces a party to breach a contract by (a) enticing the party not to perform or (b) preventing them from performing their obligations through improper means.
Proving tortious interference in court is complicated. It is a complex legal issue that requires a great deal of evidence. Your best recourse is to have a business attorney who specializes in tort and contract law.
For example, if a wrongdoer has caused someone else to breach their contract with you (maybe so that the wrongdoer could enter into a new contract with that someone) that is a tortious interference of contract claim.
About Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell | Maricopa County Attorney's Office, AZ.
Tortious interference is a common law tort allowing a claim for damages against a defendant who wrongfully interferes with the plaintiff's contractual or business relationships.
The first answer is that an attorney-client relationship ends upon the happening of one of three events: the first is the attorney moves to withdraw and the judge grants withdrawal, the second is the client consents the attorney off the case, and the last is that the case has ended.
Generally, liability for interference with a contract arises when the interferer induces a party to breach a contract by (a) enticing the party not to perform or (b) preventing them from performing their obligations through improper means. The interference must be intentional and without a justifiable purpose.
Interference With Existing Contractual Relationships A contract exists between the business and another individual or business. The contract was valid. An outside (third) party had knowledge of this contract. The outside party purposefully and wrongfully disrupted the contractual relationship.
For example, this may happen when a supplier intentionally acts to prevent a distributing company from meeting its contractual obligations to deliver goods to a retailer with whom they have a contract.