In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.
Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Broward
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Broward
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Damages. Typical legal damages for tortious interference include economic losses, if they can be proven with certainty, and mental distress. Additionally punitive damages may be awarded if malice on the part of the wrongdoer can be established.
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
If you want to succeed on a cause of action for tortious interference with a contractual relationship, you have to plead and prove: The existence of a contract. The defendant's knowledge of the contract. The defendant's intentional procurement of the contract's breach. Damages to the plaintiff as a result of the breach.
Generally, a defendant's actions may be justified or privileged in defense to a claim of tortious interference if the defendant acts in a bona fide exercise of its own rights or possesses an equal or superior interest to that of the plaintiff in the subject matter.
If your situation meets the required elements for a legal claim, you absolutely can. In California, intentionally interfering with another person's expected inheritance is a tort (a civil wrong, which allows a person to sue another person in court, assuming the elements are met).
The elements of tortious interference The four elements are: the plaintiff's existence of a business relationship, the defendant's knowledge of the relationship, the defendant's intentional interference disrupts the relationship and the existence of damages.
To recover damages for inducing breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove that: The plaintiff was in a valid contractual relationship with a third party; The defendant knew of the existing contract; The defendant intended to induce the third party to breach the contract with the plaintiff;
Intent on the defendant's part to disrupt the economic relationship, or knowledge that disruption was likely because of their conduct; Disruption of the relationship; Harm to the plaintiff; and. A causal connection between the wrongful act and the harm.
California. Cal. Government Code § 87100, 87103. A conflict of interest exists if a legislator uses their official position to influence a governmental decision in which they know they, an immediate family member or a business they are associated with have a financial interest .