Attorney Client Privilege With Former Employees In Alameda

State:
Multi-State
County:
Alameda
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a complaint filed in the Circuit Court regarding the interference with attorney-client privilege involving former employees in Alameda. It outlines allegations against defendants who allegedly conducted ex parte communications with the plaintiff's former treating physicians and attorney, violating the confidential relationships established by attorney-client and patient-physician privileges. The plaintiff claims damages resulting from emotional distress and wrongful advice due to this interference. Key features of this form include detailed sections for plaintiff and defendant identification, a clear count of the causes of action, and the request for compensatory and punitive damages. Filling out the form requires careful attention to the details of each party involved and the specific incidents leading to the claims. Legal professionals, such as attorneys, partners, and paralegals, can use this form to address grievances related to unauthorized disclosures and communications that undermine client rights. It is essential for users to ensure that all attachments and exhibits mentioned are included to support their claims effectively.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship

Form popularity

FAQ

Former Employees Can Have Privileged Communications With Their Former Employer's Lawyer, but Cannot Waive Its Privilege.

Crime or Fraud Exception. If a client seeks advice from an attorney to assist with the furtherance of a crime or fraud or the post-commission concealment of the crime or fraud, then the communication is not privileged.

An exception is to further a crime or fraud. Suppose your conversation with an attorney includes a plan to commit a crime or fraud. In that case, the attorney-client privilege doesn't apply. Also, there is imminent death or harm.

Thus, the attorney-client privilege will generally protect pre-advice communications between non-attorney employees if the purpose of the communication was to facilitate the provision of legal advice and the information obtained in response to the communication was promptly provided to counsel.

Lawyer-client relationship of trust and prevents a lawyer from revealing the client's information even when not subjected to such compulsion. Thus, a lawyer may not reveal such information except with the informed consent of the client or as authorized or required by the State Bar Act, these rules, or other law.

California Code, Evidence Code - EVID § 950. As used in this article, “lawyer” means a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the client to be authorized, to practice law in any state or nation. Read this complete California Code, Evidence Code - EVID § 950 on Westlaw.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Attorney Client Privilege With Former Employees In Alameda