• US Legal Forms

Use Of Deception In Research In Massachusetts

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document outlines a complaint filed in the United States District Court regarding the use of deception in research, specifically pertaining to life insurance policies in Massachusetts. It highlights fraudulent activities by the defendants, who misrepresented the nature of a life insurance policy that was supposed to have vanishing premiums after a certain age. The plaintiff asserts that they were misled regarding the terms and performance of this policy, relying on inaccurate illustrations provided by the defendants. Important features of the case include specific allegations of fraudulent concealment and misrepresentation of critical facts that were intentionally hidden. For legal professionals such as attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants, this document serves as a crucial reference for understanding how deceptive practices can be legally challenged. It illustrates the importance of transparency and accurate communication in insurance contracts, as well as the legal recourse available for individuals misled by such practices. The complaint guides legal practitioners on how to frame similar cases, emphasizing the necessity of thoroughly investigating the representations made by corporations in their promotional materials.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The study must not involve more than minimal risk to the subjects. The use of deceptive methods must be justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value.

Forgive and Move On: If it's a minor issue and they show remorse. Set Boundaries: If their behavior is harmful, establish clear boundaries. Seek Mediation: In cases of ongoing relationships, a neutral third party can help. Cut Ties: If the deception is severe or repeated, it might be best to distance yourself.

The deceptive practice or information should not increase the risks of the study, and subjects must be fully debriefed. Subjects must have the opportunity to ask questions about the new information and be given the opportunity to withdraw from the study and have their data removed.

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

For studies involving deception, debriefing materials should explain the design and procedures used for deception, and the reason(s) why deception was necessary. After debriefing participants in studies that have involved deception, it may be necessary to re-consent participants.

The debriefing is an essential part of the informed consent process and is mandatory when the research study involves use of deception. The debriefing provides participants with a full explanation of the hypothesis being tested, procedures to deceive participants and the reason(s) why it was necessary to deceive them.

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

For studies involving deception, debriefing materials should explain the design and procedures used for deception, and the reason(s) why deception was necessary. After debriefing participants in studies that have involved deception, it may be necessary to re-consent participants.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Use Of Deception In Research In Massachusetts