• US Legal Forms

Deceptive Practices In Research In Dallas

State:
Multi-State
County:
Dallas
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint addressed to the United States District Court regarding deceptive practices in research, specifically related to the sale of life insurance policies in Dallas. It outlines the plaintiff's assertion that the defendants fraudulently misrepresented and concealed critical information about the policy's premium structure, leading the plaintiff to purchase under false pretenses. Key features of the form include detailed allegations of fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of contract, with the plaintiff detailing specific misrepresentations and omitted facts that influenced their decision. Filling instructions mandate that users accurately complete the relevant personal and policy information, while editing instructions advise careful review for clarity and accuracy. This form is especially useful for attorneys and legal professionals handling insurance fraud cases, enabling them to advocate effectively for their clients by presenting well-documented claims. Partners, owners, and associates may find value in this template for preparing similar legal actions or as a reference for understanding the intricate nature of insurance representations. Paralegals and legal assistants can utilize the structure provided to assist in filing similar complaints or gathering evidence relevant to deceptive practices in their legal research.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

Deception or incomplete disclosure should only be used when no reasonably effective, alternative methods are available to achieve the goals of the research. Only study procedures that involve minimal risks (as determined by the IRB) can include deception or incomplete disclosure.

Some forms of deception include: Lies: making up information or giving information that is the opposite or very different from the truth. Equivocations: making an indirect, ambiguous, or contradictory statement.

(a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Deception is typically used to promote scientific validity, with participants provided with false or incomplete information about the research in order to obtain unbiased data with respect to the participants' attitudes and behavior.

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

Active deception involves intentionally providing inaccurate or false information to participants (e.g., one study team member tells participants that they will be engaged in a cooperative task with other participants, but instead they will be interacting with other members of the study team).

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: • Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

In general, deception is not acceptable if, in the judgment of the IRB, the participant may have declined to participate had they been informed of the true purpose of the research.

Examples of Active Deceptive Research Participants complete a quiz and are falsely told that they did poorly, regardless of their performance. Participants who do not know they are in a research study are observed to see how they behave when they find valuables (e.g., wallet, laptop) unattended in a public location.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Deceptive Practices In Research In Dallas