Prominent activists like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who had long championed both abolition and women's rights, voiced strong opposition to the amendment, which permitted states to deny women the vote without repercussions by using the term "male." This perceived betrayal led to a rift between abolitionist leaders and ...
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
On the other hand, we struggle with the First Amendment when it protects expression that we find offensive, hateful, or hurtful. In those cases, our instinct may be to squelch the speech and perhaps even punish those who are engaging in it.
Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality.
Why was the Fourteenth Amendment controversial in women's rights circles? This is because, for the first time, the proposed Amendment added the word "male" into the US Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” That provision rightly repudiated the Supreme Court of the United States's shameful decision in Dred Scott v.
The Fourteenth Amendment was the most controversial and far-reaching of these three Reconstruction Amendments.
Access to U.S. citizenship has expanded over time, from the establishment of a pathway to citizenship for merely 80% of the population in 1790, to the provision of birthright citizenship starting in 1868, with subsequent removal of racially discriminatory barriers to naturalization.