Unfortunately, Maryland is not a comparative negligence state.
Intentional torts – An intentional tort is one in which the defendant knew or should have known that their action would cause injury. For example, if someone physically attacks another person, the injured person would have a tort claim against the attacker.
Negligent torts can encompass a wide range of situations, such as car accidents caused by reckless driving, medical malpractice resulting from a doctor's negligent treatment, or slip and fall accidents due to a property owner's failure to maintain safe premises.
Provide as much detail as possible. Provide all related supportive documentation: Include all receipts, two appraisals or repair estimates, proof of ownership (if property damage is claimed), photographs, and medical documents or records, as well as police, incident or witness reports (if applicable).
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION IN MARYLAND the statement and which, if erroneous, will cause loss or injury; (d) the plaintiff, justifiably, takes action in reliance on the statement; and (e) suffers damage proximately caused by the defendant's negligence.
To prove negligence in Maryland, there are four crucial elements that must be established: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Together, these four elements form the basis for proving negligence in Maryland.
Under Maryland law, a person found to be contributorily negligent may not recover ANY damages for their injuries, regardless of how minor their contribution to the accident might have been.
Negligence thus is most usefully stated as comprised of five, not four, elements: (1) duty, (2) breach, (3) cause in fact, (4) proximate cause, and (5) harm, each of which is briefly here explained.
Identifying the Four Tort Elements The accused had a duty, in most personal injury cases, to act in a way that did not cause you to become injured. The accused committed a breach of that duty. An injury occurred to you. The breach of duty was the proximate cause of your injury.
Tort liability is predicated on the existence of proximate cause, which consists of both: (1) causation in fact, and (2) foreseeability. A plaintiff must prove that his or her injuries were the actual or factual result of the defendant's actions.