Motion To Strike Form For More Definite Statement In Washington

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-00004BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This is a generic Affidavit to accompany a Motion to amend or strike alimony provisions of a divorce decree because of the obligor spouse's changed financial condition. This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.

Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition

Form popularity

FAQ

A motion for a more definite statement must be filed before filing a responsive pleading. FRCP 12(e). Therefore, unless ordered otherwise by the court, the motion must be filed within 21 days after being served with a summons and complaint, or within 60 days if service of the complaint was timely waived.

A motion to strike may be brought against complaints, cross-complaints, answers and demurrers. A motion to strike can be brought against an entire pleading, or any part of a pleading.

A motion to strike is a request by one party in a United States trial requesting that the presiding judge order the removal of all or part of the opposing party's pleading to the court.

A party may move for a more definite statement if either: The pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response. More particularity in the pleading can help dispose of the action efficiently and economically. (Wash.

C.C.P. § 436 allows for a motion to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading” or portion of a pleading “not drawn of filed in conformity with the laws of this state.” A motion to strike is proper “when a substantive defect is clear from the face of a complaint.” (PH II, Inc.

What happens next? If we filed the motion to strike in a trial court, then we will set the motion to be heard by a judge or magistrate, and be ruled upon. If we filed it in an appeals court, the appeals court will read the motion and offending document and will rule on it without hearing.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that "The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Similarly, for example, the California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a motion to strike may be made to strike out any "irrelevant, ...

A “motion to dismiss” is typically filed in response to a complaint and is made in lieu of filing an “answer.” Technically, a plaintiff can move to “strike” a defense that a defendant has pled, given that defenses are subject to the same pleading requirements as are the plaintiff's claims.

(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing the party's responsive pleadings.

More info

(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. Motion for a More Definite Statement.Preliminary Requirements. This template is a motion to strike improper content from a pleading in a civil action in Washington superior court. No further action shall be taken in the pending action and no subsequent pleading or other paper shall be filed until the judgment is paid. This practice note discusses motions for a more definite statement and motions to strike in civil actions in Washington superior court. (e) MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Plaintiff's Motion for More Definite Statement serves as an illustrative example of this dispute. (e) MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Defendants opposed. Dkt.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike Form For More Definite Statement In Washington