Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In Kings

State:
Multi-State
County:
Kings
Control #:
US-00004BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The Motion to Strike for More Definite Statement in Kings is a legal form used to request clarification or detail in a pleading when a party believes it lacks sufficient information to respond. This motion allows the requesting party to compel the opposing party to provide a clearer statement of the claims or defenses. It is crucial for attorneys and legal professionals to ensure that all motions comply with local court rules and procedural guidelines. Users must fill in relevant case details, including the names of the parties involved and any specific claims requiring clarification. This motion is particularly useful for attorneys, paralegals, and associates who handle cases that may involve vague allegations, as it helps enhance the precision of pleadings. The utility of this motion extends to partners and owners who oversee legal strategies, ensuring that their teams present robust pleadings. Legal assistants will find the form helpful to streamline the clerical process and maintain organized case files. Overall, this form contributes to the clarity and efficiency of legal proceedings by prompting more thorough disclosures from the opposing party.
Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition

Form popularity

FAQ

Rule 12(b)(6), permitting a motion to dismiss for failure of the complaint to state a claim on which relief can be granted, is substantially the same as the old demurrer for failure of a pleading to state a cause of action.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that "The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Similarly, for example, the California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a motion to strike may be made to strike out any "irrelevant, ...

What does a trial test that a 12(b)(6) motion does not? Answer: Trial tests the truth of the allegations.

Rule 12(b)(6), permitting a motion to dismiss for failure of the complaint to state a claim on which relief can be granted, is substantially the same as the old demurrer for failure of a pleading to state a cause of action.

Summary. Rule 12(f) allows courts to strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from pleadings. Judge Hollander's opinion in Blevins v. Piatt provides clear criteria for granting or denying a Rule 12(f) motion.

A motion for a more definite statement must be filed before filing a responsive pleading. FRCP 12(e). Therefore, unless ordered otherwise by the court, the motion must be filed within 21 days after being served with a summons and complaint, or within 60 days if service of the complaint was timely waived.

“To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a plaintiff must plead sufficient facts to state a claim that is “plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v.

The court will not dismiss any claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) unless the plaintiff has failed to plead sufficient facts to state a facially plausible claim for relief.

(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing the party's responsive pleadings.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In Kings