Motion To Strike Form For More Definite Statement In Franklin

State:
Multi-State
County:
Franklin
Control #:
US-00004BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The Motion to strike form for more definite statement in Franklin is a legal document used to request that a court requires a party to clarify or specify vague or ambiguous statements made in their pleadings. This form is particularly beneficial for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants who need to ensure that their filings are precise and well-defined, thereby reducing any potential confusion during legal proceedings. Key features of this form include sections for detailing the specific deficiencies in the opposing party's statements and a formal request for clarification. When filling out the form, users should address the motion to the appropriate court, provide clear evidence of the vagueness, and submit the document according to the local court rules. Legal professionals can utilize this form to streamline case preparation, enhance communication, and ultimately improve the chances of a favorable ruling by ensuring that all parties understand the issues at hand. Overall, the Motion to strike form serves as a vital tool in legal strategy, promoting clarity and supporting thorough legal arguments.
Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree Because Of Obligor Spouse's Changed Financial Condition

Form popularity

FAQ

Rule 12(f) provides in relevant part that on motion or sua sponte, “the court may strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” If Lexis annotations are a guide, relatively few litigants file Rule 12(f) motions on those grounds—and with good reason.

Upon motion made by a party before responding to a pleading or, if no responsive pleading is permitted by these rules, upon motion made by a party within 20 days after the service of the pleading upon the party or upon the court's own initiative at any time, the court may order stricken from any pleading any ...

C.C.P. § 436 allows for a motion to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading” or portion of a pleading “not drawn of filed in conformity with the laws of this state.” A motion to strike is proper “when a substantive defect is clear from the face of a complaint.” (PH II, Inc. v.

If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleading.

This rule allows a defendant to file a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and subject matter jurisdiction relates to the foundational issue of the court's power to hear the case at all.

A motion for a more definite statement must be filed before filing a responsive pleading. FRCP 12(e). Therefore, unless ordered otherwise by the court, the motion must be filed within 21 days after being served with a summons and complaint, or within 60 days if service of the complaint was timely waived.

A motion to strike is a request to a judge that part of a party's pleading or a piece of evidence be removed from the record. During the pleading stage, this can be accomplished by a tool such as Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a state equivalent.

A motion to strike is a request by one party in a United States trial requesting that the presiding judge order the removal of all or part of the opposing party's pleading to the court.

Per Rule 1.110(d), attorneys must now provide a clear and concise statement of ultimate facts when asserting affirmative defenses. Prior to this amendment, a defendant's affirmative defenses did not have to be pled with supporting factual evidence, and had the ability to be more broad.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike Form For More Definite Statement In Franklin