Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In San Diego

State:
Multi-State
County:
San Diego
Control #:
US-00002BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The Motion to Strike for More Definite Statement in San Diego is a legal form utilized in civil litigation to seek clarification and specificity in the pleadings filed by another party. This form allows a defendant to request the court to compel the plaintiff to provide a clearer statement regarding claims that may be vague or ambiguous. Key features of this motion include outlining the particular aspects of the plaintiff's statement that are unclear and justifying the necessity for a more precise response. Filling out this form requires the inclusion of case details, such as the names of parties involved, cause number, and a statement of the reason for seeking clarification. It is essential for legal practitioners to carefully edit the motion to ensure it is precise and compelling. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants who are navigating complex litigation cases, as it enhances the clarity of legal arguments and aids in efficient court procedures. By using this motion, legal professionals can help prevent unnecessary delays and promote a fair resolution in legal disputes.
Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree on Remarriage of Plaintiff
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree on Remarriage of Plaintiff

Form popularity

FAQ

As with all motions, a motion to strike must state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order to strike, as well as the relief sought. FRCP 7(b); Smart Code®. Under FRCP 12(f), the court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.

Summary. Rule 12(f) allows courts to strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from pleadings. Judge Hollander's opinion in Blevins v. Piatt provides clear criteria for granting or denying a Rule 12(f) motion.

C.C.P. § 436 allows for a motion to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading” or portion of a pleading “not drawn of filed in conformity with the laws of this state.” A motion to strike is proper “when a substantive defect is clear from the face of a complaint.” (PH II, Inc. v.

Grounds for a motion to strike include the following: The pleading is false; that is, untrue. The pleading is filed without the required leave of court. The form of pleading is in violation of a court order. The pleading is filed late. The pleading is barred by the statute of limitations. The pleading must be verified.

What happens with one "strike" prior? A defendant who is convicted of any new felony who has one "strike" prior (known as a second striker) must go to prison (i.e., cannot be sent to a rehab facility or placed on probation) for twice the sentence otherwise prescribed for the new offense.

A motion for a more definite statement must be filed before filing a responsive pleading. FRCP 12(e). Therefore, unless ordered otherwise by the court, the motion must be filed within 21 days after being served with a summons and complaint, or within 60 days if service of the complaint was timely waived.

C.C.P. § 436 allows for a motion to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter asserted in any pleading” or portion of a pleading “not drawn of filed in conformity with the laws of this state.” A motion to strike is proper “when a substantive defect is clear from the face of a complaint.” (PH II, Inc.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that "The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Similarly, for example, the California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a motion to strike may be made to strike out any "irrelevant, ...

FRCP 12(b). Such motions are often made at the earliest stage of the case to defeat or limit a claim or to stall the case before proceeding to costly and time-consuming discovery. For this reason, courts claim that FRCP 12(b)(6) motions are generally viewed with disfavor and rarely granted. See Point of Law (POL).

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In San Diego