Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In Illinois

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-00002BG-I
Format:
Word; 
PDF; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This is a generic Affidavit to accompany a Motion to amend or strike alimony provisions of a divorce decree on the remarriage of the plaintiff former spouse. This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.

Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree on Remarriage of Plaintiff
  • Preview Affidavit of Defendant Spouse in Support of Motion to Amend or Strike Alimony Provisions of Divorce Decree on Remarriage of Plaintiff

Form popularity

FAQ

(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleading.

A motion for a more definite statement must be filed before filing a responsive pleading. FRCP 12(e). Therefore, unless ordered otherwise by the court, the motion must be filed within 21 days after being served with a summons and complaint, or within 60 days if service of the complaint was timely waived.

§ 21-1.01. Criminal Damage to Government Supported Property. (4) deposits on government supported land or in a government supported building, without the consent of the State, any stink bomb or any offensive smelling compound and thereby intends to interfere with the use by another of the land or building.

Under Illinois Rule of Evidence 607, the party who called the witness may not attack the witness's credibility by means of a prior inconsistent statement unless there is a showing of affirmative damage, with certain exceptions relating to the rules of hearsay.

Summary. Rule 12(f) allows courts to strike redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter from pleadings. Judge Hollander's opinion in Blevins v. Piatt provides clear criteria for granting or denying a Rule 12(f) motion.

Sec. 2-607. Bills of particulars. (a) Within the time a party is to respond to a pleading, that party may, if allegations are so wanting in details that the responding party should be entitled to a bill of particulars, file and serve a notice demanding it.

(e) Motion for More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleading.

At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion.

Illinois Rule of Evidence 408 provides that evidence of a settlement offer or acceptance and conduct or statements made during settlement negotiations is not admissible when it is “offered to prove liability for, the invalidity of, or amount of a claim that was disputed as to validity or amount or to impeach through a ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Motion To Strike For More Definite Statement In Illinois