Either by: Agreeing to the terms of service agreement with an EFSP or. “Filing Consent to Electronic Service and Notice of Electronic Service Address (form EFS-005-CV).” EFS-005-CV is a new form that would need to be used if the filer chose that path.
A party may serve documents electronically directly, by an agent, or through a designated electronic filing service provider. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2011.)
A party may serve documents electronically directly, by an agent, or through a designated electronic filing service provider. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2011.)
The server must: Be at least 18 years old. Not be part of your case. Give your court papers to the other side by the deadline. Fill out a proof of service form. Give the proof of service form back to you so you can file it with the court.
When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter.
(B) Any period of notice, or any right or duty to do any act or make any response within any period or on a date certain after the service of the document, which time period or date is prescribed by statute or rule of court, shall be extended after service by electronic means by two court days, but the extension shall ...
When being served by mail, parties have an additional five calendar days to respond, but with eService parties have an additional two court days (CCP 1010.6 B).
(2) Proof of electronic service may be in electronic form and may be filed electronically with the court. (3) Under rule 3.1300(c), proof of service of the moving papers must be filed at least five court days before the hearing.
A party or other person may serve documents electronically directly, by an agent, or through a designated electronic filing service provider.
Under such circumstances, courts have held that service by e-mail alone comports with due process so long as the plaintiff establishes the e-mail is likely to reach the defendant and the record discloses diligent efforts by the plaintiff to obtain a physical address to effect traditional service, the defendant conducts ...