A voluntary participant in a game, sport, or contest, assumes all risks incidental to the particular game, sport, or contest which are obvious and foreseeable. However, he or she does not assume an extraordinary risk which is not normally incident to the game or sport. Even where the assumption of the risk doctrine applies, defendants have a duty to use due care not to increase the risks to a participant over and above those inherent in the sport. While under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant has no legal duty to eliminate or protect a plaintiff from the risks inherent in a sport, but the defendant owes a duty not to increase the inherent risks. To determine whether the primary assumption of risk doctrine applies to a sports participant, the court must decide whether the injury suffered arises from a risk inherent in the sport, and whether imposing a duty might fundamentally alter the nature of the sport.
The following form is a complaint that adopts the "notice pleadings" format of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which have been adopted by most states in one form or another.
Title: King Washington Complaint due to Fall while Ice Skating as a Result of Inattentiveness of Skating Instructor Introduction: In this article, we will discuss a King Washington complaint that arose due to a fall while ice skating, which was attributed to the inattentiveness of a skating instructor. Ice skating is a popular activity during the winter months, and it is important for skating instructors to uphold safety standards to avoid accidents. 1. Description of the Incident: The incident involved a King Washington resident, who fell while ice skating at a local rink due to the inattentiveness of their skating instructor. The complainant alleges that the instructor did not provide adequate guidance and supervision, leading to the fall and subsequent injuries. 2. Consequences of the Fall: The complaint outlines the immediate consequences faced by the individual after the fall, such as bruises, sprains, or fractures. It may also mention any long-term physical or psychological effects resulting from the accident, such as ongoing pain or fear associated with ice skating. 3. Negligence of the Skating Instructor: This section highlights the specific instances of inattentiveness or lack of supervision exhibited by the skating instructor. It may involve scenarios like failing to spot hazards on the ice, not providing proper instructions, or ignoring safety guidelines provided by the skating rink's management. 4. Failure in Duty of Care: The complainant may argue that the skating instructor failed in their duty of care to ensure the safety of the skaters. They could mention how other instructors at the rink were more attentive, highlighting a lack of consistency in training and supervision. 5. Effect on Skating Experience: The complaint may detail how the incident impacted the individual's overall experience with ice skating. It may touch on how the fall and subsequent injuries have diminished their enjoyment of the activity and caused loss of confidence. 6. Request for Compensation: To conclude the complaint, the individual may specify the desired compensation, which could include reimbursement for medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, pain and suffering, lost wages due to time off work, and any other relevant damages. Other types of King Washington Complaint due to Fall while Ice Skating as a Result of Inattentiveness of Skating Instructor: — King Washington Complaint regarding Inadequate Safety Measures during Ice Skating Lessons — King Washington Complaint against a Skating Instructor for Failing to Address Ice Rink Hazards — King Washington Complaint about Skating Instructor's Negligence Causing a Fall and Injury.
