In legal proceedings, Wyoming's response to plaintiff's motion for auditor or new trial is a crucial document that seeks to address and dispute the plaintiff's request for an increase in damages (auditor) or a new trial in a civil case. This response is filed by the defendant or the opposing party, and it aims to persuade the court against granting the plaintiff's motion. Keywords: Wyoming, response, plaintiff's motion, auditor, new trial, civil case, damages, defendant, opposing party, court. Types of Wyoming Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Auditor or New Trial: 1. Legal Basis: The response begins by highlighting the legal basis that underlines the defendant's opposition to the plaintiff's motion for auditor or new trial. It draws upon relevant statutes, rules of civil procedure, and legal precedents to build a persuasive argument against the plaintiff's request. 2. Rebuttal of Allegations: The response addresses each of the plaintiff's arguments for auditor or new trial individually, offering counterarguments and refuting their claims. It aims to demonstrate any factual inaccuracies, legal errors, or inconsistencies in the plaintiff's motion. 3. Damages Assessment: If the plaintiff requests auditor, the response assesses the adequacy of the awarded damages in light of relevant factors such as the severity of the injury, medical expenses, loss of wages, pain and suffering, and other applicable considerations. It presents a robust argument explaining why the damages awarded reflect a fair and just compensation. 4. Inadequacy of Evidence: In the case of a motion for a new trial, the response may argue that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was sufficient and strongly supported the jury's verdict. It may highlight any procedural or evidentiary flaws in the plaintiff's case and argue against the necessity of a new trial based on such shortcomings. 5. Precedent and Jurisdiction: The response may cite relevant case law and previous court decisions to solidify its argument against the plaintiff's motion. It may demonstrate how similar cases in Wyoming have been adjudicated, emphasizing that the requested auditor or new trial is unnecessary or unwarranted. 6. Affidavits or Supporting Evidence: To strengthen their response, the defendant may submit affidavits or other supporting evidence to establish facts, challenge the plaintiff's claims, or offer expert opinions if necessary. These additional documents provide further substantiation of the defendant's opposition to the plaintiff's motion. 7. Conclusion: The response concludes by summarizing all the arguments made and reiterating the defendant's strong opposition to the plaintiff's motion for auditor or new trial. It concludes with a request for the court to deny the plaintiff's motion and uphold the original verdict or award. In summary, the Wyoming response to plaintiff's motion for auditor or new trial addresses the plaintiff's request for increased damages or a retrial in a civil case. It employs legal arguments, evidence, and precedents to persuade the court against granting the plaintiff's motion.