In Wisconsin, Summary Judgment Procedure in Cases Assigned to Judge James D. Peterson is a procedure followed by the court when resolving a civil lawsuit without a trial. The Judge James D. Peterson Summary Judgment Procedure consists of the following: 1. Motion for Summary Judgment: A party to the lawsuit may make a motion for summary judgment, which is a request to the court to find in their favor without the need for a trial. 2. Affidavit: The party making the motion must provide an affidavit stating the facts of the case and why summary judgment should be granted. 3. Opposition: The opposing party has the opportunity to oppose the motion by submitting an affidavit and/or other documents that support their position. 4. Reply Affidavit: The party who made the motion may submit a reply affidavit in response to the opposition's affidavit. 5. Argument: Both parties may present oral argument to the court as to why summary judgment should or should not be granted. 6. Decision: Judge James D. Peterson will then make a decision on whether to grant summary judgment. If the motion is granted, the case is concluded without a trial. If the motion is denied, the case will proceed to trial. The different types of Wisconsin Summary Judgment Procedure in Cases Assigned to Judge James D. Peterson are motion for summary judgment, affidavit, opposition, reply affidavit, argument, and decision.