Washington Motion for Refusal and Change of Venue Due to Co-Defendant's Prior Criminal Convictions is a legal pleading filed in the Washington state court system. This motion requests that the presiding judge recuse themselves from the case and that the trial be moved to a different location, due to concerns regarding a co-defendant's prior criminal convictions. Refusal refers to a judge voluntarily stepping down from a case, usually when there is a potential bias or conflict of interest that could prejudice the defendant's right to a fair trial. In this situation, the motion argues that the judge should recuse themselves because of the co-defendant's previous criminal history, which may create a prejudiced view or bias against the current case. The motion also seeks a change of venue, requesting that the trial be moved to a different location within the same jurisdiction or to a different jurisdiction altogether. This is done to ensure that the trial can be conducted impartially and without any preconceived notions or prejudices based on the co-defendant's prior convictions, which may have received significant media attention or influenced public opinion. Keywords: Washington, Motion for Refusal, Change of Venue, Co-Defendant's Prior Criminal Convictions, legal pleading, judge, bias, conflict of interest, fair trial, criminal history, prejudiced view, change of location, different jurisdiction, impartial trial, media attention, public opinion. Different types or variations of the Washington Motion for Refusal and Change of Venue Due to Co-Defendant's Prior Criminal Convictions may include: 1. Motion for Partial Refusal: This motion specifically asks for only a partial refusal of the judge, meaning that the judge would be allowed to preside over some aspects of the case but not others. This could be requested when the co-defendant's prior convictions are only relevant to certain parts of the trial or if the judge has a personal or professional relationship with the co-defendant that could affect the defendant's right to a fair trial. 2. Motion for Complete Refusal: In this motion, the defense requests that the presiding judge entirely recuse themselves from the case due to concerns of bias or conflict of interest. This would typically be requested if the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions have a direct impact on the entire trial or if the judge has a personal or professional connection to the co-defendant that would prevent them from making impartial rulings. 3. Motion for Change of Venue within the Same Jurisdiction: This motion asks for the trial to be moved to a different location within the same jurisdiction to ensure impartiality. It may be filed if there is significant media coverage or public sentiment related to the co-defendant's prior convictions, making it challenging to find an unbiased jury or conduct a fair trial in the current location. 4. Motion for Change of Venue to a Different Jurisdiction: When concerns of prejudice or bias are so significant that moving the trial within the current jurisdiction may not be sufficient, the defense may request a change of venue to a different jurisdiction altogether. This motion argues that a fair trial cannot be guaranteed in the current jurisdiction due to the impact of the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions and seeks to move the trial to a location where the likelihood of prejudice is significantly reduced. These different types of motions allow the defense to tailor their arguments according to the specific circumstances of the case and the potential impact of the co-defendant's prior criminal convictions on their client's right to a fair trial.