?The tort of abuse of process occurs when a party has wilfully [sic] misused criminal or civil process after it has issued in order to obtain a result not contemplated by law.? Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp, 303 Md.
Five fundamental elements form the foundation of malicious use of civil process claims under Maryland law: (1) a prior civil proceeding initiated by the defendant, (2) lack of probable cause for the proceeding, (3) malice, (4) the prior proceeding ended favorably for the plaintiff, and (5) special damages.
An action for malicious prosecution requires proof offour elements: "the prosecution was (1) malicious, (2) instituted by or with the cooperation of the defendant, (3) without probable cause, and (4) terminated in a manner not unfavorable to the plaintiff." Reilly v. Shepherd, 273 Va.
Malicious prosecution occurs when someone sues you or brings criminal charges against you without probable cause and with harmful intent. Examples could include someone providing false evidence to the police that you committed a crime or someone suing you for hurting them even if you never caused them harm.
A malicious prosecution case can be difficult to prove, but with a few key elements it can be won in court. First, it must be clear that the defendant did not have probable cause to bring the action.
Elements of a Malicious Prosecution Claim The Original Lawsuit Was Terminated in the Plaintiff's Favor. There Was No Probable Cause. The Defendant Pursued the Lawsuit Maliciously. The Plaintiff Suffered Damages.
Malicious prosecution The defendant was actively involved in bringing or continuing the lawsuit; The lawsuit ended in the plaintiff's favor; No reasonable person in the defendant's circumstances would have believed that there were reasonable grounds to bring the lawsuit against the plaintiff;