Virginia Jury Instruction 3.3.2 Section 1 addresses the concept of Per Se Violation Tying Agreement and the Defense of Justification in the state of Virginia. A tying agreement refers to a situation where a seller conditions the sale of one product or service upon the buyer's purchase of another item. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to analyze such agreements in light of antitrust laws. The Per Se Violation Tying Agreement instruction essentially states that a tying agreement is considered a violation of antitrust laws if it meets certain criteria. To successfully establish a per se violation, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has substantial market power and that there is a separate product tied to the sale. The plaintiff must also demonstrate that the defendant has coerced or forced the buyer into the tying arrangement, resulting in anti-competitive effects in the relevant market. However, the Defense of Justification instruction provides an opportunity for the defendant to present a valid defense in certain cases. Under this defense, the defendant may argue that the tying arrangement benefits consumers or contributes to the efficiency of the marketplace. To succeed, the defendant must prove that the alleged tying arrangement has pro-competitive justifications that outweigh its potential anti-competitive effects. There are no different types of Virginia Jury Instruction 3.3.2 Section 1, Per Se Violation Tying Agreement — Defense Of Justification. The instruction mainly focuses on defining the per se violation criteria and setting forth the defense of justification for tying agreements. It provides a comprehensive overview of how the jury should analyze these cases in light of the antitrust laws in the state of Virginia. Overall, Virginia Jury Instruction 3.3.2 Section 1 is a crucial tool in guiding juries to understand the factors involved in determining whether a tying agreement constitutes a per se violation. By considering both the elements of the violation and the potential defenses, the jurors can make an informed decision in cases involving tying agreements in Virginia.