Tennessee Jury Instruction — Identification Testimony refers to the set of guidelines provided to jurors by the court regarding assessing witness identification testimony in criminal cases. These instructions are crucial as identifying the perpetrator is often a critical component of the prosecution's case. Jurors must carefully evaluate and consider the accuracy and reliability of such testimony. Tennessee recognizes several types of Identification Testimony instructions, which help guide the jury's decision-making process. These instructions help jurors understand key concepts and evaluate the credibility of witnesses offering identification testimony. Some relevant keywords associated with Tennessee Jury Instruction — Identification Testimony include: 1. Eyewitness identification: This instruction emphasizes the importance of eyewitness testimony in identifying the accused. It provides guidelines for assessing the reliability and accuracy of such testimony, considering factors like the witness's opportunity to observe, level of attention, and any potential sources of error or bias. 2. Cross-racial identification: This instruction is specifically relevant in cases where the eyewitness and the accused belong to different racial or ethnic backgrounds. Research has shown that cross-racial identification can be more prone to errors, and this instruction helps jurors understand and account for this potential bias. 3. Memory and recall: This instruction addresses the fallibility of human memory and the potential influence of external factors on witness identification. It educates jurors on the malleability of memory and the risk of false or altered recollections over time. 4. Show-up identification: Show-up identification refers to a situation where law enforcement presents a single suspect to an eyewitness shortly after an incident. This instruction warns jurors about the potential unreliability of show-up identifications, as they may involve suggestive or biased procedures. 5. Lineup identification: Lineup identification involves presenting an eyewitness with a group of individuals, which may include the suspect, to identify the perpetrator. The instruction highlights the importance of fair and unbiased lineup procedures to eliminate any suggestive influence that may affect the witness's identification decision. 6. Expert testimony: In some cases, experts in eyewitness identification may be called to provide their professional opinions on the accuracy and reliability of the identification testimony. This instruction educates jurors on how to evaluate and weigh expert testimony in their decision-making process. Overall, Tennessee Jury Instruction — Identification Testimony provides jurors with the necessary tools to assess the credibility and accuracy of identification testimony. By understanding the complexities and potential pitfalls associated with eyewitness identification, jurors can make more informed and fair judgments in criminal trials.