Title: Understanding Puerto Rico Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use Introduction: In Puerto Rico, a Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal maneuver used to exclude any reference or evidence related to the use or non-use of seat belts during a trial. This motion seeks to prevent the introduction of seat belt evidence, arguing that it is irrelevant, prejudicial, or potentially misleading for the jury. Types of Puerto Rico Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use: 1. General Motion in Liming: This type of motion in liming seeks to exclude any reference, mention, or evidence pertaining to seat belt use or non-use throughout the entire trial. It emphasizes that such information should not be considered when determining liability or damages. 2. Prejudice and Misleading Motion in Liming: This motion argues that any reference to seat belt use might create bias or prejudice in the minds of the jury, potentially swaying their judgment. The aim is to prevent the defendant from using seat belt evidence as a tool to shift blame on the plaintiff or minimize their liability. 3. Irrelevance Motion in Liming: This motion contends that seat belt usage is unrelated to the central issue of the case. It asserts that evidence concerning seat belt use does not contribute to the determination of negligence or causation and should be excluded from discussions and presentations during the trial. 4. Unsupported Inference Motion in Liming: This type of motion seeks to prevent the opposing party from drawing unsupported inferences or assumptions based on seat belt non-use. It argues that seat belt use is not legally compulsory in Puerto Rico and that a party's decision not to wear one should not be misconstrued as negligence or contributory fault. Importance of Puerto Rico Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use: 1. Protecting the Jury's Impartiality: By blocking any mention of seat belt use, this motion helps maintain the jury's objectivity by preventing the introduction of potentially biased information that could affect their decision-making process. 2. Upholding Legal Relevance: The motion ensures that only the most pertinent evidence is admitted during the trial, focusing on elements directly related to the case's main issues, rather than diverting attention to seat belt use, which may not be legally significant in determining fault or damages. 3. Preventing Prejudice and Misleading Associations: Excluding seat belt evidence helps avoid prejudice against parties involved in accidents and discourages the misleading interpretation that non-use automatically implies negligence or contributory fault. Conclusion: In Puerto Rico, the Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use serves as a valuable legal tool, protecting the integrity of a trial by excluding potentially irrelevant, misleading, and prejudicial information related to seat belt use. By employing different types of motions in liming, the courts ensure that discussions and evidence revolve around the case's substantive issues, promoting fairness and just adjudication.