Oklahoma Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is a legal strategy utilized in Oklahoma court proceedings to exclude evidence related to any efforts made by a defendant to repair or improve a potentially dangerous condition after an incident or accident. This motion aims to prevent opposing counsel from introducing evidence of remedial measures taken by the defendant with the intention of biasing the jury or judge. Keywords: Oklahoma, Motion in Liming, Prevent Evidence, Remedial Measures, legal strategy, court proceedings, defendant, dangerous condition, incident, accident, opposing counsel, biasing, jury, judge. Types of Oklahoma Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures: 1. Pretrial Motion: This type of motion is usually filed well in advance of the trial to notify the court and opposing counsel regarding the intention to exclude any evidence related to remedial measures. It allows both parties to prepare their arguments and establish the grounds for the motion. 2. Specific Preclusion: This type of motion requests the court to exclude evidence of specific remedial measures taken by the defendant that may not be relevant or proportionate to the case. It focuses on highlighting the lack of relevance between the remedial measures and the actual incident or accident. 3. General Preclusion: In this type of motion, the aim is to exclude any evidence related to remedial measures, regardless of their specificity or relevance. It argues that such evidence might prejudicial influence the perception of the jury or judge, diverting their attention from the actual merits of the case. 4. Precedent-based Motion: This type of motion relies on specific legal precedents or court decisions in Oklahoma that support the exclusion of evidence of remedial measures. It seeks to establish a strong legal foundation for the motion and strengthen the argument against admissibility. 5. Expert Witness Motion: Occasionally, a motion can be filed specifically to preclude expert witness testimony related to remedial measures. This type of motion challenges the expert witness's credibility or argues that their testimony is not based on sound scientific or technical grounds. It is important to consult with a legal professional to determine the most appropriate type of motion in liming to prevent evidence of remedial measures in an Oklahoma court case. The specific circumstances of each case and the relevant laws should be carefully examined to ensure the motion is tailored to maximize its effectiveness.