Oklahoma Failure to Appeal or File Briefs; Duty of Counsel; Scope of Review is the legal process in which an appellate court reviews a lower court’s decision in a criminal or civil case. This review can involve a number of different types of appeal, including a direct appeal, a petition for writ of certiorari, an interlocutory appeal, and a writ of mandamus. The main purpose of the review is to determine whether a lower court’s decision is correct or should be overturned. The duty of counsel is to ensure that the appeal is properly filed and argued. This includes researching the applicable law, filing all necessary paperwork, and presenting the case in the best possible manner. Counsel also has a duty to ensure that the client is fully informed of all legal options available to them. The scope of review is the range of issues that the appellate court considers when conducting its review. This can include questions of law, questions of fact, and questions of procedure. Appellate courts may also consider new evidence or arguments when making their decisions. Different types of Oklahoma Failure to Appeal or File Briefs; Duty of Counsel; Scope of Review include direct appeals, petitions for writ of certiorari, interlocutory appeals, and writs of mandamus. A direct appeal is when a party brings a lower court’s decision directly to the appellate court. A petition for writ of certiorari is a request to the appellate court to review a lower court’s decision. An interlocutory appeal is when a party appeals a lower court’s decision before the case has been decided. A writ of mandamus is a request to the appellate court to order a lower court to act on a case.