If you need to full, obtain, or print legitimate papers templates, use US Legal Forms, the biggest collection of legitimate kinds, that can be found on the web. Make use of the site`s basic and practical look for to get the documents you need. A variety of templates for business and individual functions are sorted by types and claims, or key phrases. Use US Legal Forms to get the North Dakota Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice within a couple of click throughs.
In case you are already a US Legal Forms client, log in for your bank account and click on the Download key to get the North Dakota Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice. You can even accessibility kinds you in the past saved inside the My Forms tab of your bank account.
If you use US Legal Forms for the first time, follow the instructions beneath:
Each and every legitimate papers format you purchase is yours eternally. You possess acces to each and every develop you saved with your acccount. Click on the My Forms portion and decide on a develop to print or obtain once more.
Contend and obtain, and print the North Dakota Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice with US Legal Forms. There are many skilled and state-distinct kinds you may use for your personal business or individual requires.
A defendant may not be convicted of any offense upon the testimony of an accomplice unsupported by corroborative evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of such offense.
Corroboration is the ability to compare information provided by two separate sources and find similarities between them. When a second source provides the same or similar information to the first, the second source is considered to corroborate (e.g. support, or agree with) with the first.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.
The nature of corroboration is that it is confirmatory evidence and it may consist of the evidence of second witness or of circumstances like the conduct of the person against whom it is required. Corroboration must connect or tend to connect the accused with the crime.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.
Rule 707 requires the prosecution to notify a defendant if it intends to introduce an analytical report in a criminal trial. If the defendant objects to the admission of the report, the defendant must identify the witness it seeks to examine about the report at trial and the prosecution must produce the witness.
Corroborating evidence is evidence that strengthens or confirms already existing evidence. In courts, it is used to support the testimony of a witness. For example, California has a statute that defines corroborating evidence in the context of a conviction.
"A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime."