Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-02676BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.


This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.

The Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document used in Kansas courts to challenge a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena that demands the production of documents or evidence) by arguing that it is unjust, burdensome, or unfair. Under Kansas law, parties who receive a subpoena duces tecum are entitled to file a motion to quash if they believe that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. The purpose of this affidavit is to provide detailed evidence and arguments supporting the motion to quash the subpoena. In this affidavit, the person filing the motion (the moving) must provide specific facts and reasoning demonstrating why the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. They may argue that the subpoena demands an excessive amount of documents, is overly broad, irrelevant to the case, or poses an undue burden on the moving. The affidavit should also outline the potential harm or prejudice that could result from complying with the subpoena. Different types of Kansas Affidavits in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive may include: 1. Affidavit of Unreasonable Burden: This type of affidavit focuses on demonstrating that the burden of complying with the subpoena is excessive, such as requiring the production of numerous documents that are not relevant to the case or demanding a significant amount of time, effort, or resources. 2. Affidavit of Irrelevance: This type of affidavit argues that the documents requested by the subpoena are not relevant to the issues at hand in the case, and their production would serve no purpose other than harassment or inconvenience. 3. Affidavit of Privacy: If the moving believes that the subpoena infringes on their privacy rights or seeks confidential or sensitive information, they can file an affidavit highlighting these concerns and asserting the need to protect their privacy. Overall, the Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum plays a vital role in challenging unjust or oppressive subpoenas. It helps ensure that parties are protected from undue burden, unfair requests, or infringement on their rights while promoting the fair administration of justice in Kansas courts.

Free preview
  • Preview Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive
  • Preview Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive

How to fill out Kansas Affidavit In Support Of Motion To Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum On The Grounds That Subpoena Is Unreasonable And Oppressive?

If you want to full, obtain, or printing lawful file themes, use US Legal Forms, the most important variety of lawful types, which can be found on the web. Use the site`s simple and easy practical research to obtain the files you need. Different themes for company and specific purposes are sorted by classes and states, or search phrases. Use US Legal Forms to obtain the Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive in just a number of mouse clicks.

In case you are currently a US Legal Forms consumer, log in in your accounts and then click the Acquire key to obtain the Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive . You can even entry types you in the past saved within the My Forms tab of your accounts.

If you are using US Legal Forms initially, follow the instructions below:

  • Step 1. Be sure you have chosen the form for that appropriate metropolis/country.
  • Step 2. Utilize the Review option to check out the form`s content. Do not overlook to read the outline.
  • Step 3. In case you are not satisfied together with the develop, utilize the Look for discipline on top of the screen to find other models from the lawful develop design.
  • Step 4. When you have found the form you need, select the Purchase now key. Opt for the costs strategy you prefer and add your qualifications to sign up on an accounts.
  • Step 5. Approach the financial transaction. You can use your Мisa or Ьastercard or PayPal accounts to complete the financial transaction.
  • Step 6. Choose the formatting from the lawful develop and obtain it in your device.
  • Step 7. Total, edit and printing or indicator the Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive .

Every single lawful file design you acquire is yours permanently. You may have acces to every develop you saved within your acccount. Click the My Forms area and decide on a develop to printing or obtain once again.

Be competitive and obtain, and printing the Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive with US Legal Forms. There are many professional and express-certain types you may use for your personal company or specific requires.

Form popularity

FAQ

A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...

Failure to respond to a subpoena is punishable as contempt by either the court or agency issuing the subpoena. Punishment may include monetary sanctions (even imprisonment although extremely unlikely).

Common grounds for objecting to a third-party subpoena for documents include: Improper service. Improper issuance. Vague, ambiguous, and unreasonable requests. Insufficient time to reply. Disclosure of privileged or confidential information. Disclosure of trade secrets. Undue burden or expense. Inaccessible data.

The purpose of filing a motion to quash is to challenge the legal sufficiency or validity of the document or proceeding in question. When a motion to quash is filed, the court will review the arguments and evidence presented by the party filing the motion, as well as any opposing arguments.

One method of responding to a subpoena is to file what is known as a ?Motion to Quash.? A ?motion? is a written document directed to the judge in the case asking the judge to take some action for the reasons stated in the motion. ?Quash? is a legal term meaning to terminate, reject or void.

A subpoena is an Order that is issued to require the attendance of a witness to testify at a particular time and place. A subpoena duces tecum is an Order that requires a witness to bring documents, books or other items under his, her or their control, that he she or they is bound by law to produce into evidence.

Common grounds for filing a motion to quash are that the individual is outside the subpoena range, or that the items to be produced are unavailable within the specified time or at the specified location. Other common grounds for filing a motion to quash include undue burden and expense.

Undue Burden. Subpoena recipients often object on the ground that compliance with the subpoena is unduly burdensome and expensive. Rule 45(d)(1) requires parties issuing a subpoena to ?take reasonable steps to avoid imposing an undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena.? Fed.

Interesting Questions

More info

A subpoena must state the court's name and the title of the proceeding, include the seal of the court, and command the witness to attend and testify at the time ... Apr 12, 2021 — ... a motion to quash or modify a subpoena duces tecum generally may be made only by the party to whom the subpoena is directed.32 An exception ...R. Crim. P. 17(c) allows the court in a criminal proceeding to quash a subpoena duces tecum that it determines to be unreasonable or oppressive. Courts have the authority to quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive. The Commission agrees with RPS that the request as written ... Defendant argues that objection to the issuance of the subpoena is, in effect, a motion to quash the subpoena. ... support issuance of a subpoena duces tecum. The ... On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that: (i) ... a party by causing a subpoena duces tecum to be issued pursuant to K.S.A. 60 ... Pettit, seek a writ of mandamus, compelling the dis- trict court to vacate its overruling of their motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. We granted leave to. This form is available on Westlaw. Easily search more than 600,000 legal forms to find the exact form you need. Please visit our site to learn more and request ... Feb 10, 2022 — If an objection or motion to quash is made, the party issuing the subpoena must get a court order to compel the person's compliance. Failure to ... PUB is concerned that cumulative misrepresentations by various parties about PUB's approach to discovery will create an unjustified impression before this ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Kansas Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive