In an adversary proceeding, specifically governed by Rule B 255, the Indiana Subpoena plays a crucial role as a legal document that commands the production of necessary evidence or testimony. This type of subpoena holds significant weight in legal proceedings and ensures that all parties have access to relevant information for a fair and just resolution. The Indiana Subpoena can be categorized into two types: Subpoena Ducks Cecum and Subpoena Ad Testificandum. 1. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: This type of Indiana Subpoena is designed to compel the production of documents, records, or other tangible evidence that may be vital for an adversary proceeding. The Subpoena Ducks Cecum requires the party in possession of the sought-after evidence to deliver it to the court promptly. This could include financial records, contracts, emails, photographs, or any other relevant materials that ensure a comprehensive understanding of the case. 2. Subpoena Ad Testificandum: Unlike the Subpoena Ducks Cecum, the Subpoena Ad Testificandum focuses on compelling an individual's testimony at a trial, deposition, or hearing. This type of subpoena calls for a person to appear before the court and provide oral or written testimony. It is often used to summon witnesses who possess valuable knowledge or have firsthand experience related to the matter under consideration. In order to obtain an Indiana Subpoena in an Adversary Proceeding — B 255, parties must follow specific guidelines set out by the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure. This typically includes drafting a formal request stating the purpose of the subpoena, the identities of the parties involved, and the documents or testimony sought. The issuance of the subpoena is typically authorized by a judge or magistrate. It is important for all parties involved in an adversary proceeding to understand the significance of the Indiana Subpoena and its different types. By utilizing Subpoena Ducks Cecum, necessary documents can be obtained to support a legal argument, while Subpoena Ad Testificandum allows for the exploration of testimonial evidence vital to the case. It is crucial to adhere to the legal process and seek professional guidance when dealing with sub points in an adversary proceeding to ensure compliance with the established rules and regulations.