Connecticut Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-02539BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

A quiet title action is filed by a person or entity claiming title to all or a portion of a specific parcel of property and asks for a ruling that plaintiff's title is superior to any interest held or claimed by any of the named defendants. It is a mechanism to cure defects in the title to property, thereby providing assurance to the owner who brings the action, as well as subsequent purchasers, of the status of title and accuracy of the real property records.


Although a deed expresses the intention of the parties, if there is a material mistake, a court of equity may grant appropriate relief. A court of equity will order the cancellation or reformation of a deed where it appears that a material mistake has been made.


This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.

Free preview
  • Preview Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees
  • Preview Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees
  • Preview Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees

How to fill out Complaint To Reform Deed - Mistake In Erroneous Names Of Two Grantees?

You are able to invest hrs on the web attempting to find the lawful record design that suits the state and federal demands you will need. US Legal Forms offers a huge number of lawful types which are reviewed by pros. You can easily download or print the Connecticut Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees from the support.

If you already possess a US Legal Forms profile, you can log in and click on the Obtain option. Following that, you can complete, modify, print, or indicator the Connecticut Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees. Each lawful record design you purchase is the one you have permanently. To acquire yet another duplicate of any obtained form, proceed to the My Forms tab and click on the related option.

If you are using the US Legal Forms web site the very first time, stick to the easy guidelines listed below:

  • Very first, ensure that you have chosen the best record design for the state/city of your liking. Read the form description to make sure you have picked out the proper form. If readily available, utilize the Preview option to search with the record design also.
  • In order to get yet another edition of your form, utilize the Lookup industry to obtain the design that meets your needs and demands.
  • When you have found the design you want, click on Buy now to proceed.
  • Select the pricing program you want, type your accreditations, and sign up for a merchant account on US Legal Forms.
  • Full the financial transaction. You should use your Visa or Mastercard or PayPal profile to fund the lawful form.
  • Select the format of your record and download it for your product.
  • Make modifications for your record if possible. You are able to complete, modify and indicator and print Connecticut Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees.

Obtain and print a huge number of record themes making use of the US Legal Forms website, which offers the most important selection of lawful types. Use expert and state-certain themes to tackle your small business or personal needs.

Form popularity

FAQ

For the correction to be valid, the affidavit must be attached to the original recorded document with a cover sheet complying with Cal. Gov. Code 27361.6, stating the reason for rerecording on the cover sheet, by the person who submitted the original document for recording (Cal. Gov.

All alterations to the deed must be authenticated by the signatures of all the parties against each amendment made. If a plan to the original deed is amended, then all the parties should re-sign the plan. If a new plan is substituted for an existing plan in the original deed , all the parties should sign the new plan.

Currently, Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, and West Virginia are the jurisdictions where a notice statute is in effect.

The California Civil code states that a contract may be rescinded if it ?was given by mistake, or obtained through duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence, exercised by or with the connivance of the party as to whom he rescinds, or of any other party to the contract jointly interested with such party.? (Civ.

From here, the process looks like this: Choose the most appropriate deed. Prepare the deed. Complete the deed with accurate information about the property and the person being added. Sign the deed in the presence of a notary public. File the deed with the county recorder's office. Update the property records.

How to Correct a Deed Re-recording of the original document. With corrections made in the body of the original document. A cover sheet detailing the changes. Must be re-signed and re-acknowledged. Correction Deed. A new deed reflecting the corrections/changes. Must meet all recording requirements of a deed.

The Connecticut Quiet Title Process Under Connecticut General Statute § 52-325, the Notice of Lis Pendens provides notice to the public of the pending title claim and forces future owners of the property to take the property subject to the outcome of the court action.

A correction deed, also known as a confirmatory or corrective deed, is a legal document used to fix errors on a property title that is recorded. Property owners can use this special type of deed to amend common errors such as misspellings, incomplete names, and other missing information.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Connecticut Complaint to Reform Deed - Mistake in Erroneous Names of Two Grantees