A jury instruction is the judge's oral explanation of the law governing a case. Jury instructions are given after the attorneys have presented all the evidence and have made final arguments, but before the jury begins deliberations. Improper explanations of the law to be applied in jury instructions are often the basis for later appeals. Proof of demand and refusal is not essential to the maintenance of an action for conversion when the conversion is otherwise established.
Connecticut Instruction to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion: In the state of Connecticut, the legal concept of conversion refers to the wrongful exercise of control over someone else's property, depriving them of their right to possess or use it. However, there are certain instances where the demand for the return of the property is not necessary to constitute conversion. This instruction to the jury aims to clarify these circumstances. One type of situation where demand is not necessary in constituting conversion is when the defendant's actions are inherently inconsistent with the rightful owner's property rights. For instance, if the defendant were to sell, destroy, or substantially alter the property without the owner's consent, it would be considered conversion without the need for a prior demand for its return. Another scenario where demand is unnecessary is if the defendant wrongfully obtains the property through dishonest means, such as theft or fraud. In such cases, the defendant's unauthorized control over the property itself is enough to establish conversion. Connecticut jury instructions also specify that when the owner of the property has been wrongfully dispossessed or wrongfully excluded from using it, demand is not required to establish conversion. If the defendant actively prevents the owner from accessing or utilizing their own property, it constitutes conversion regardless of whether a demand was made beforehand. It is important for the jury to consider whether the defendant's actions were intentional and deliberately adverse to the owner's property rights when determining if demand is necessary in constituting conversion. The defendant should have known that their actions would result in interference with the owner's property rights, making a demand redundant in establishing conversion. Overall, Connecticut's instruction to the jury as to when demand is not necessary in constituting conversion revolves around situations where the defendant's actions clearly demonstrate a disregard for the owner's property rights. Some key associated keywords with this topic may include conversion, Connecticut law, demand, property rights, wrongful control, unauthorized possession, exclusion, dispossessed, and intentional interference. Different types of Connecticut instructions relating to conversion may include: 1. Connecticut Instruction to Jury as to Conversion through Unauthorized Sale or Disposal of Property. 2. Connecticut Instruction to Jury as to Conversion through Theft or Fraudulent Means. 3. Connecticut Instruction to Jury as to Conversion through Wrongful Dispossession or Exclusion. 4. Connecticut Instruction to Jury as to Conversion without Prior Demand in Deliberate Actions.
