The California Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture is a legal document that serves as an official and final decision by the court regarding the forfeiture of property or assets in the state of California. This judgment is agreed upon by the parties involved in the case, typically the law enforcement agency and the owner of the property in question. Keywords: California Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture, legal document, forfeiture of property, assets, court decision, law enforcement agency, property owner. There are two main types of California Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture: 1. Civil Asset Forfeiture: This type of judgment is typically associated with cases where the property or assets are believed to be connected to illegal activities, such as drug trafficking or money laundering. Law enforcement agencies can seize the property under suspicion and eventually file for forfeiture, leading to an Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture if agreed upon by the parties involved or decided by the court. 2. Criminal Asset Forfeiture: This type of judgment is usually a result of criminal proceedings where the property or assets are considered proceeds of illegal activities or instrumentalities of the offense committed. In such cases, the court can order the forfeiture of the property or assets as part of the criminal sentence, and an Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture may be reached between the prosecution and the defense. It is important to note that both civil and criminal asset forfeitures require strong evidence to support the claim of illegal activity or connection to the offense committed. The Agreed Judgment of Forfeiture provides a legal framework for the process, ensuring that the parties involved have reached an agreement or a court decision has been made, safeguarding the due process rights of the individuals involved.