A California Motion to Withdraw as Attorney is a legal document filed by an attorney who wishes to be relieved from representing their client in a case or legal matter. This motion is typically brought forth when an attorney-client relationship has become untenable, or when there is a conflict of interest, non-payment of legal fees, communication breakdown, or other valid reasons. There are different types of California Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, including the following: 1. Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record: This type of motion is filed when an attorney wants to withdraw from representing a client in a specific case. The attorney must provide valid reasons for their withdrawal and obtain permission from the court before they are released from their professional responsibilities. 2. Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record: Similar to the previous type, this motion allows an attorney to withdraw from representing a client but applies to a broader context. It pertains to situations where an attorney wants to end their representation in all pending cases for that specific client. 3. Motion to Withdraw as Appointed Counsel: This particular motion is related to cases where an attorney has been appointed by the court to represent a defendant who cannot afford legal representation. The attorney must present substantiated reasons, such as a conflict of interest or non-compliance with the defendant, to be relieved of their duties. When filing a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, it is crucial to include relevant details and supporting evidence to convince the court of the justification for withdrawal. These may include communication logs, letters, or other documents illustrating the breakdown of the attorney-client relationship or the existence of a conflict of interest. It is also vital to serve a copy of the motion to the client and any other parties involved in the case. By filing a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, an attorney seeks to ensure their ethical obligations are met, maintain the integrity of their profession, and ensure the best interest of the client is served. Ultimately, it is the court's decision whether to grant the motion, considering the implications on the ongoing legal proceedings and the client's right to effective representation.