A judge said the absence of a ?guiding human hand? disqualified the AI-generated image from copyright protection, but other generative art may still qualify. The United States Copyright Office (USCO) has famously denied copyright to selfies taken by non-human animals .
Aug 21 (Reuters) - A work of art created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law, a U.S. court in Washington, D.C., has ruled.
Here are things to do and things to avoid when using AI-Generated Art: Use AI to create works that are sufficiently different from existing works to avoid copyright infringement. This can be done by using different datasets, unique prompts, and parameters to create unique pieces.
Aug 21 (Reuters) - A work of art created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law, a U.S. court in Washington, D.C., has ruled.
Matthew Allen's AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can't be copyrighted because it's too much ?machine? and not enough ?human.? An award-winning piece of AI art cannot be copyrighted, the US Copyright Office has ruled.