Sample interrogatory objections for trial are formal written responses used by a party to a lawsuit to object to specific questions posed by the opposing party during the discovery phase. These objections help to clarify and narrow down the scope of the information sought and ensure the fairness of the trial proceedings. Here are some types of sample interrogatory objections that may arise during a trial: 1. Relevancy Objection: This objection is used when the opposing party asks questions that are not related or relevant to the issues in the case. The objection asserts that the information sought is not material to the claims or defenses involved. 2. Over broad Objection: If an interrogatory request is overly broad and seeks information that is not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence, a party may object on the grounds that it violates the principle of proportionality. 3. Vagueness or Ambiguity Objection: When the language of an interrogatory is unclear or open to multiple interpretations, a party may object on the basis that the question is vague or ambiguous. This objection seeks clarification and prevents misunderstandings. 4. Privilege Objection: If an interrogatory request seeks information that is protected by attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other recognized privilege, a party may object on the grounds of privilege and withhold the requested information. 5. Burdensome or Oppressive Objection: When the interrogatory requests an undue burden upon the party, such as requiring an extensive search, a party may object on the grounds that the request is burdensome, oppressive, or overly expensive. 6. Compound Question Objection: When a single interrogatory contains multiple questions that require separate and distinct responses, a party may object on the basis that the question is compound. This objection seeks to ensure clarity and proper addressing of each individual question. 7. Call for Narrative Answer Objection: If the interrogatory request requires the answering party to provide a narrative response rather than specific facts or documents, a party may object on the grounds that it calls for a narrative answer instead of a direct response. 8. Court Order or Protective Order Objection: If a court has previously issued an order or a protective order that restricts or prohibits the disclosure of specific information, a party may object to an interrogatory that violates such an order. By utilizing these sample interrogatory objections during a trial, parties can ensure that the discovery process remains fair, efficient, and focused on the relevant issues in the case, ultimately contributing to the integrity of the trial.