Whether for business purposes or for individual matters, everyone has to handle legal situations sooner or later in their life. Filling out legal documents needs careful attention, starting with picking the proper form sample. For instance, if you choose a wrong edition of a Temporary Restraining Order Without Bond, it will be turned down once you submit it. It is therefore important to get a dependable source of legal documents like US Legal Forms.
If you have to obtain a Temporary Restraining Order Without Bond sample, follow these easy steps:
With a vast US Legal Forms catalog at hand, you never need to spend time searching for the appropriate template across the internet. Utilize the library’s simple navigation to find the right template for any situation.
Fourth: You cannot practically appeal a TRO because it may only last for at most 28 days, if contested. Once you are served with the Ex-Parte TRO, you may request a motion to modify or dissolve the TRO after giving your spouse 48-hour notice and seek attorney fees if the filing was false or frivolous.
In Texas, a Temporary Restraining Order (or ?TRO?) is a document filed with your initial petition. It can be filed in a divorce or a child custody matter. As the name suggests, once signed, it temporary restrains you, the other party, or both you and the other party from engaging in certain acts.
Once you are served with the Ex-Parte TRO, you may request a motion to modify or dissolve the TRO after giving your spouse 48-hour notice and seek attorney fees if the filing was false or frivolous.
MOTION TO VACATE. Any individual affected by a temporary ex parte order may file a motion at any time to vacate the order. On the filing of the motion to vacate, the court shall set a date for hearing the motion as soon as possible. Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 34, Sec.
The purpose of a motion to dissolve an injunction is ?to provide a means to show changed circumstances or changes in the law that require modification or dissolution of the injunction; the purpose is not to give an unsuccessful party an opportunity to relitigate the propriety of the original grant.?