A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Cease And Desist Sample Letter For Collection Agency In Phoenix
Category:
State:
Multi-State
City:
Phoenix
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 USC 1692c), you are hereby notified to immediately cease communications concerning the collection of the debt associated with the above-referenced account.
Receiving a cease and desist letter is a serious issue. It indicates the sender's intention to pursue you for the alleged wrongdoing if you do not follow their demands. Receiving a cease and desist letter does not necessarily mean you will end up in Court.
DEBT COLLECTORS CANNOT: contact you at unreasonable places or times (such as before AM or after PM local time); use or threaten to use violence or criminal means to harm you, your reputation or your property; use obscene or profane language;
A cease and desist letter is a formal written request that tells a debt collector to stop contacting you. It is your right under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) to limit how debt collectors can communicate with you.
If you write a letter, instead of using the tear-off form, the debt dispute letter should include your personal identifying information; verification of the amount of debt owed; the name of the creditor for the debt; and a request the debt not be reported to credit reporting agencies until the matter is resolved or ...
Bottom line: You can stop a collection agency from calling you by writing them a letter telling them not to call you anymore- that you're not paying the debt, and why. If they call again, then google ``FDCPA attorneys'', call one, tell them whats going on.
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lays out the rules for debt collectors and states that if the creditor is told to stop contacting the debtor, they must comply. If the harassing calls and letters persist, a cease and desist letter can be sent by an attorney to formally advise the creditor to stop violating the de.
What is the 11 word credit loophole? The 11 word credit loophole does not exist, despite common misconceptions. If you're wondering, the phrase “Please cease and desist all calls and contact with me immediately” is often mistakenly believed to have special legal power.
